We all scroll past those impossibly perfect celeb photos, but what if we told you the stars you idolize don’t even recognize themselves in them? We’ve uncovered the side-by-side receipts that expose the industry’s most ridiculous retouch jobs. Natural beauty was erased, curves were exaggerated, and faces turned into plastic fantasies. These before-and-afters are shocking, downright absurd—and some of these will leave you questioning everything about fame, beauty, and what’s real. You’ll never look at a magazine cover the same way again.

Angelina Jolie

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a woman with light green eyes, full lips, and long dark hair wearing dangling earrings. The left image shows natural skin texture with visible freckles and blemishes, while the right image features a flawless, airbrushed complexion with enhanced contrast.
Image via @9GAG on X

Meet the unfiltered Angelina: radiant skin with real texture, natural tones, and that signature effortless stare. She needed no serum, cream, or magic potion. This is the beauty she just woke up with.

And yet, they still retouched her. Pores blurred, tone perfected, and glow enhanced like she spent hours with a glam squad, as if you weren’t already a masterpiece. We see it. We see you, Angie.

Whichever way you slice it, she’s Angelina. No amount of editing can create that level of effortless, jaw-dropping presence — it’s all her.

Oprah

Side-by-side images showing an original photo of a woman in a sparkling lavender gown seated on a black ottoman, and a TV Guide cover with Oprah Winfrey's face edited onto the same body, now surrounded by stacks of money. The TV Guide cover includes the headline “Oprah! The Richest Woman on TV?”
Image via @DrPopCultureUSA on X

The ’90s really went questionable with this one. Oprah, queen of TV, ended up with someone else’s body entirely. Her face slapped on like a last-minute school project, perched on a throne of cash.

You know what’s iconic? Oprah didn’t need this Frankenstein-level Photoshop to look powerful. But apparently TV Guide thought, “Nuh-uh. We have to borrow Ann-Margret.”

The body double move is honestly so chaotic. We won’t call this a Photoshop achievement. Like, was the goal to confuse people or just save time?

Beyoncé

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a woman with dark eye makeup, red lipstick, and light brown hair pulled back. The left image shows natural skin texture with visible lines and pores, while the right image features smoother, airbrushed skin with enhanced contouring and makeup contrast.
Image via u/Witchbitxh on Reddit

The final edit gives us a Beyoncé so flawless, she barely looks real. Since when did Queen B become a CGI character? It’s hard to ignore how much of Beyoncé’s natural beauty got airbrushed out.

Swing your gaze to the left side, and voilà! We see Beyoncé looking every bit the human goddess she is, complete with the kind of skin texture that proves she’s mortal like the rest of us.

Makeup artists called the raw photo strategic. As one retoucher noted online, “They almost never perfect the makeup, because it gets things done much faster and it’s the way the photographer or magazine artists want.”

Candice Huffine

Side-by-side photos of a woman with long dark hair posing on her knees in a gray one-shoulder cut-out swimsuit with black high heels and silver bangles. The left image shows her natural body with visible curves and skin folds, while the right image is a retouched version with a slimmer waist, smoother skin, and enhanced lighting.
Image via u/CyanFrozenWaves on Reddit

She came to slay—serving looks, power, and actual body. Editors didn’t Oprah-ed her, yet they erased half her waist like it was a typo.

The edit tried so hard to fit a standard that it flattened out what made the original pop. The swimsuit fits like it’s glued on by a sci-fi costume designer.

Why does every editor think curves are optional? The first shot is real, bold, and beautiful. The second looks like a poster for a superhero who fights cellulite instead of crime.

Keira Knightley

Side-by-side images of a woman dressed as an archer in a brown leather warrior outfit, holding a drawn bow and arrow. The left image shows a natural photo with realistic lighting and skin texture, while the right image features a retouched, stylized version with smoother skin, warmer tones, and a dramatic background.
Image via @Telegraph on X

Keira Knightley draws her bow, ready to slay, but Photoshop beat her to it. On the left, she’s rocking natural vibes, wild curls, and a no-nonsense warrior stare.

The right side, though? That’s where someone at the studio said, “Let’s add some extra drama.” The lighting’s hotter than a summer blockbuster, and her chest seems to have gotten a suspiciously magical upgrade.

Keira didn’t see it coming. For her, the original shows her character’s strength and authenticity, like she might actually take out an enemy or two. The edit, on the other hand, screams, “But make it sexier, or else!”

Jennifer Lopez

Side-by-side close-up photos of a woman with brown eyes, full lips, and gold hoop earrings. The left side shows her with visible facial wrinkles and a soft smile, while the right side depicts a smoother complexion with a serious expression, highlighting makeup differences.
Image via u/parishilton2 on Reddit

On the left, we see Jennifer Lopez as she stepped onto the red carpet: radiant, confident, and rocking those little smile lines that remind us she’s human, just like the rest of us.

Then comes Photoshop, armed with its digital eraser of doom. Bye-bye, fine lines! Farewell, pores! J.Lo’s skin is now smoother than a marble countertop, and her cheekbones look ready to cut glass.

It’s the classic case of real woman meets pixel-perfect fantasy. And honestly, if even J.Lo gets the airbrush treatment; what chance do the rest of us have at dodging those beauty apps?

Megan Fox

Side-by-side close-up images of a woman with long dark hair, blue eyes, and light pink lipstick, set against a soft blue background. The left image shows natural skin with visible texture and subtle makeup, while the right image is a retouched version with flawless skin, enhanced blush, and slightly fuller lips.
Image via Tati Taylor and Tetiana Kostylieva on fixthephoto.com

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the left photo, shall we? That’s Megan Fox in her natural form—flawless skin, piercing blue eyes, and bone structure that could make a sculptor weep.

She’s serving ethereal, she’s serving effortless, she’s serving already perfect. But no, that wasn’t enough for whoever took the digital airbrush to her face. We’ve got Megan 2.0.

You’d think she just jogged through a rose garden. Cheeks flushed. Lips with extra pop. Skin so smoothed out. This is when beauty standards go off the rails. Megan was already the blueprint of digital-perfection machines!

Madonna

Side-by-side images of a woman with wavy blonde hair, wearing a beige corset, long lace-up boots, large hoop earrings, and a white fur stole. The left image shows natural skin texture and fine lines, while the right image features smoother skin, enhanced lighting, and a polished, airbrushed look.
Image via u/Kimksleftcheek on Reddit

There’s something almost too perfect about that retouched Madonna. The wild edges are gone; skin’s flawless, glow’s dialed up. It’s gorgeous — but where’s the rebel who rewrote the rules?

Look at the original and you see it: that raw, unbothered Madonna energy. The stare that launched a thousand trends. A little texture? Who cares. She’s commanding attention, no digital polish needed.

Give us the unfiltered queen any day. The retouch might be pretty, but it’s the real Madonna who keeps rewriting the rulebook, and there’s no shame in aging.

Rachel Weisz

Side-by-side images of a woman with dark wavy hair sitting cross-legged on a black bench, wearing a low-cut black dress with vertical stripes on the bodice. The left image shows a natural look with visible skin texture and lighting variations, while the right image features a retouched version with smoother skin, brighter highlights, and enhanced contrast.
Image via joshbenson.com

Rachel Weisz, effortlessly gorgeous, just chilling like a mortal goddess. But over in Photoshop Land? Her neck got the full egret treatment, stretched like she’s ready to pluck fish out of a pond.

Those arms and legs? They look like they belong in a Renaissance painting until editors overenthusiastically restored them. All smoothened out. Making the ‘after’ photo boring.

Why the sudden urge to turn her into a mythical creature? Next time, maybe leave Rachel’s neck out of it—she’s stunning enough without the bird cosplay.

Kris Jenner and Gordon Ramsay

Side-by-side photos of a woman in a black dress holding a cookbook next to a man in a white chef's jacket. The left image shows natural skin texture and lighting, while the right image features a retouched version with smoother skin tones, softened facial lines, and enhanced brightness.
Images via @gordongram and @krisjenner on Instagram

Gordon’s version appears to be a photo taken by two ordinary people after a fun event. Kris’s version looks like they got beamed into a video game cutscene. Even GTA 6 has more details compared to this.

Their faces don’t even look like they’ve seen daylight in Kris’s post. Gordon’s forehead got a blur so strong it’s practically reflective. And Kris? She looks like her face was made out of satin.

It’s the same moment, but two totally different vibes. Gordon kept it real, Kris kept it filtered. The internet was right to laugh—because it’s kind of hilarious.

Mariah Carey

Side-by-side images of a woman in a black dress holding a champagne glass, with annotations highlighting digital retouching. The edits include volume added to hair, jawline thinned, creases on neck and underarm removed, tears in the dress fixed, waist pulled in, leg defined, stretch marks removed, and an all-over bronzed skin tone applied.
Image via @photofinishing on Tumblr

They added hair volume, snatched that waist, and went full bronzed goddess mode. Even her dress got a digital tailoring session—tears removed, fabric smoothed, and creases gone.

Can’t a diva’s dress have a little personality too? Leave the stretch marks alone. Her waist being pulled in is just diabolical. Editors had so much time for Photoshop at the HQ.

Even her skin’s bronzed like she just got back from a two-week tropical getaway. They couldn’t resist and turned that “make it more Mariah” button. Newsflash: She was already more Mariah.

Kelly Clarkson

Side-by-side images of a woman with wavy blonde hair wearing a purple off-the-shoulder top, blue jeans, and a large belt buckle, standing with her hands in her pockets. The left image shows a natural look with soft lighting, while the right image features a slightly retouched version with smoother skin and enhanced color contrast.
Image via u/Coffeelurker on Reddit

So Kelly Clarkson stands there, looking cool, casual, and very much herself. Purple tee, jeans, belt—ready to drop a hit or grab a snack. But hold up, the right side shows where Photoshop decided.

“Let’s cinch that waist like it’s the 1800s.” Suddenly, she’s rocking proportions that defy basic anatomy. Arms thinner. Face smaller. All of Kelly’s assets were stripped from her.

The original Kelly is confident, relaxed, and perfectly fine, thank you very much. The edit? It’s trying way too hard to sell a fantasy no one asked for. It’s giving classic “magazine said so” energy.

Lindsay Lohan

Side-by-side close-up photos of a woman with long blonde hair, green eyes, and light pink lipstick. The left image shows natural skin texture with visible freckles, shine, and fine lines, while the right image features a retouched version with flawless, smooth skin and enhanced eye makeup.
Image via MaryReadsABook on Pinterest

They tried so hard for perfection that it kind of erased what made her face hers. Lindsay’s gorgeous freckles. Those were her lucky charms, and you can’t just erase them.

The whole edited photo screams, “What if Lindsay, but make it Sims 4?” We won’t be surprised if she starts to speak Simlish in her interviews. Editors, you did Lindsey so wrong here.

She’s been out having fun, not posing for a wax figure mold. It seems that someone has discovered the blur tool for the first time. Lindsay was their victim.

Faith Hill

Side-by-side images of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a patterned sleeveless dress, sitting on a couch. The left image shows the original photo with natural skin and lighting, while the right image is a Redbook magazine cover featuring a retouched version with smoother skin, brighter hair, and enhanced contrast.
Image via Alyce Coghlan on Medium

Bright smile, breezy hair, and looking like she’s about to offer you sweet tea. Faith Hill was already giving total sunshine energy in the original shot.

Sure, the smile’s still there, but every little line has vanished like it’s a crime to age. Her arm? Slimmed down so much it’s practically a different person’s. They also edited out her beautiful freckles.

We’ll accept the sweet tea, Faith, and let’s talk about Hollywood’s unrealistic beauty standards. Your unedited photo alone exudes cover-worthy charm.

Tyra Banks

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a woman with curly blonde hair, hazel eyes, and nude lipstick. The left image shows natural skin texture and fine lines, while the right image presents a digitally retouched version with smoother skin, brighter eyes, and enhanced symmetry.
Image via joshbenson.com

Her face already says, “I’m that girl,” no edits required. She’s radiant, she’s human, she’s serving effortless supermodel. We don’t wake up like that. But Tyra did.

However, we can’t always have nice things. The retoucher went full sci-fi, narrowing her nose and amplifying those eyes. Tyra’s probably staring at the final result thinking, “Who is she?”

It’s wild because the original Tyra is already runway royalty. But somebody just had to smooth, slim, and sharpen like they were prepping her for a video game cover.

Jessica Alba

Side-by-side images of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a beige turtleneck and hoop earrings against a blue background. The left image shows a natural look with soft makeup and visible skin texture, while the right image features a retouched version with flawless skin, enhanced eye makeup, and fuller lips.
Image via r/popculturechat on Reddit

Alright, can we all agree that Jessica Alba was born looking like a walking beauty filter? The kind of face that makes you wonder what skincare sorcery she’s using, only to realize: nope, that’s just Jessica being Jessica.

Out came the Photoshop toolkit. Her skin’s been smoothed until it looks like velvet cake fondant. Her nose ever-so-slightly slimmed, her eyes made bigger and brighter like she’s starring in a Disney princess reboot.

And don’t even get us started on the lips—plumped to perfection like she’s just stepped out of a lip gloss ad. Jessica Alba is already a natural beauty, so why do we keep pretending she needs to look like an avatar?

Jennifer Lawrence

Side-by-side images of a woman reclining on a brown couch, wearing a white scalloped bra and matching underwear. The left image shows her natural body shape, while the right image depicts a digitally altered, slimmer waist and more defined curves.
Image via u/Coffeelurker on Reddit

Jennifer’s unretouched photo is already fire! She’s lounging like a queen, curves and confidence on display, proving you don’t need a filter to stop traffic — just that energy.

Here comes Photoshop: waist cinched, thighs slimmed, everything smoothed to that magazine-cover standard. It’s beautiful, sure, but wasn’t it stunning already? Digital edits love to “perfect” what’s perfect.

At the end of the day, it’s the original that reminds us: you don’t have to be reshaped to be runway-level gorgeous. JLaw’s always been that girl.

Sharon Stone

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a woman with short, tousled blonde hair, wearing a black top and drop earrings. The left image shows natural skin with visible freckles and fine lines, while the right image presents a retouched version with flawless, smooth skin and enhanced makeup definition.
Image via Rob Jacobs on Flickr

Queen of cool, goddess of confidence—and, apparently, the latest victim of the “let’s pretend women don’t age” Photoshop brigade. Oh, Sharon. We hope you know you still look stunning.

You’re still a deadly combo: A few freckles, a whisper of fine lines, and the kind of bone structure that could cut glass. You certainly don’t need a digital chisel.

Don’t get us wrong—she still looks stunning in both photos. But her natural look on the left is exactly what we should be celebrating: powerful, real, and absolutely radiant. Not this plastic-fantasy version instead.

Gwen Stefani

Side-by-side close-up photos of a woman with platinum blonde hair in high pigtails and gold hoop earrings. The left image shows her with visible skin texture and a natural smile in sunlight, while the right image shows a smoother, retouched complexion and a bright smile indoors.
Image via u/parishilton2 on Reddit

The sun blazed overhead as Gwen stepped out, golden and gleaming, with hair high and laughter ready. Cameras clicked; the world caught her in a split second of real, unfiltered charm.

Yet in the polished image, texture and character are swapped for porcelain smoothness. It’s beautiful, yes — but also eerily uniform, part of a broader trend toward digital perfection.

These side-by-sides quietly ask: What are we erasing when we smooth away every line, shine, and stray hair? And at what cost to authenticity?

Miranda Kerr

Side-by-side photos of a smiling woman with long brown hair, blue eyes, and dimples, wearing a black jacket and gray scarf. The left image shows natural skin with shine and texture, while the right image displays smoother, matte skin with a retouched glow.
Image via fashiondiscoveries.wordpress.com

Miranda Kerr showed up glowing—literally glowing—as if she had moisturized with pure sunlight. But nah, Photoshop said, “Let’s crank that down to mannequin mode.”

Editors hated that she’s all dewy and human, that she has pores, like every living person. Honestly, she looked radiant already—someone just couldn’t resist hitting the blur tool like it was an emergency.

We all get shiny sometimes, okay? The before version reminds you she’s human and fabulous. The after version? It’s giving store display model with a touch of AI-generated perfection.

Meg Ryan

Side-by-side close-up photos of a woman with wavy blonde hair, blue eyes, and rosy lipstick at an event. The left image shows natural skin with visible shine and texture, while the right image displays a retouched version with smooth, matte skin and even lighting.
Image via giraffina on Deviant Art

No way. They also “Miranda Kerr-ed” the Meg Ryan. Our Sally. She showed up serving natural glow and effortless charm. But the editor said, “What if we removed every trace of human skin?”

Now, her photo looks like an ad for the world’s most aggressive Instagram filter. We’re half-expecting it to come with hashtags like #Flawless #NoFilter (but like… all the filter).

Just a mere suggestion. How about we let celebs keep their pores once in a while? There’s no chance Meg’s skin is smoother than our Wi-Fi connection on a good day.

Thom Yorke

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a man with short, messy hair and a trimmed beard. The left image shows his natural face with one eye appearing more closed, while the right image presents a digitally adjusted version with symmetrical eyes and smoother skin.
Image via joshbenson.com

We see you, Thom. That unedited pic is pure “I’ve just written the next great Radiohead album, and I haven’t slept in days.” Crooked eyelid? Relatable. We’ve all been there.

Look! Behold the retouched Thom. Eyelids and lips are in sync, skin smoother, symmetry dialed up to radio-friendly levels. It’s In Rainbows, but for his face.

The edit’s clean, but let’s be honest: fans always preferred the demo version. Fans loved him crooked anyway. Who wouldn’t want a relatable icon after all?

Matthew Macfayden

Side-by-side close-up portraits of a man with blue eyes, dark hair, and light stubble. The left image shows visible redness on his nose and a small mark on his forehead, while the right image appears smoother with blemishes and redness removed.
Image via joshbenson.com

Oh, Matthew. That unedited shot? The tiny scar, the hint of rosiness — it’s giving moody English countryside vibes. Like he just walked off a windswept cliffside walk.

But zoom over to the touched-up pic, and hello, Hollywood! The magazine-ready Matthew. Every blemish tidied, skin smooth as silk, and eyes that pop like a movie poster. The transformation is subtle, but effective.

Honestly, we love both versions. But it’s fun to see that even TV’s most brooding heartthrob gets the magic wand treatment. Stars — they’re just like us… until they aren’t.

Cindy Crawford

Side-by-side images of a woman emerging from the ocean wearing a patterned bikini, holding onto a black pole. The left image shows a natural look with visible skin texture and loose skin on the abdomen, while the right image is retouched with smoother skin, a toned stomach, and an even complexion.
Image via emilyc00kies on Flickr

Here’s Cindy Crawford with a body that tells us a story of strength, experience, and a life lived unapologetically. It captures something far more powerful than perfection: authenticity.

Beside it, we see what Photoshop decided she should look like. Any trace of natural aging was wiped out. Every curve tightened. Editors must’ve misunderstood. Hello? Our skins are not Marvel suits.

If you think the first photo is unpleasant, then you’re clearly wrong. There’s something deeply empowering about seeing those natural lines, the strength in her arms, the softness in her skin.

Avril Lavigne

Side-by-side images of a woman with long straight blonde hair wearing a black top. The left image shows a natural portrait with soft lighting and visible skin texture, while the right image is a Cosmopolitan magazine cover featuring a retouched version with smoother skin, brighter eyes, and added text in Russian.
Image via Guadalupe Benitez on Medium

You can see her natural skin, some real texture, and she still looks iconic. Then Cosmo said, “Nah, let’s turn her into a porcelain doll.”

Did they forget she’s already Avril Lavigne, not an AI pop star? Her fans would have loved her still if they had used her original photo on the cover page. It’s her voice that sings, not her looks.

Her eyes already shone, but the editor wanted more. It’s as if they’re trying to hypnotize you into buying the magazine. Avril’s natural beauty was already hypnotizing, if you ask us.

Miley Cyrus

Side-by-side images of a woman with voluminous blonde hair, red lipstick, silver earrings, and a light gray dress with sequin details. The left image shows her natural appearance with visible skin texture and soft makeup, while the right image presents a digitally enhanced version with smoother skin, brighter eye makeup, and more pronounced curves.
Image via justjared.com and u/sirjohnmasters86 on Reddit

They really said, “What if… no nose?” Her face got so smoothed and sculpted, she’s one Photoshop tweak away from becoming a Bratz doll.

Her eyes are bigger, lips glossier, and that poor nose basically vanished into the airbrush mist. They probably don’t want Miley to breathe properly.

Netizens weren’t wrong to point it out. Not only did they notice her nose was flattened out, but they also wondered about the background change. Suspicious?

Eva Mendez

Side-by-side images of a woman with curly brown hair holding up a sparkly strapless dress in an outdoor setting. The left image shows the original natural photo with soft lighting and visible skin texture, while the right image is a Cosmopolitan magazine cover featuring a retouched version with smoother skin and enhanced brightness, overlaid with Russian text headlines.
Image via u/parishilton2 on Reddit

Of course, here we go again. Always the enemy of the story: pores. Literally, the thing that makes us all connected as humans. Eva’s skin got smoothed like glass for the cover page.

The left shot was soft, real, like she just stepped out of a fairytale forest. But the right? It doesn’t feel right at all. We’re not looking at a real goddess in the wild, but more like the fantasy version.

Even her eyes look like they’ve got built-in highlighter. They removed the creases, too. They don’t want women in all their natural glory.

Fergie

Side-by-side close-up photos of a woman with medium-length brown hair, glossy lips, and a slight smile. The left image shows natural skin texture with some shine and visible lines, while the right image displays a retouched version with smoother skin, softened features, and enhanced lighting.
Image via u/Coffeelurker on Reddit

Oh, honey, let’s talk about this side-by-side of Fergie. We’ve got our girl showing up like a real human being. Maybe even a hint of “I’ve been smiling at this event for three hours straight” exhaustion.

Apparently, in the land of impossible beauty standards, even Fergie’s flawless real-life face wasn’t “good enough”. No blush, no shine, no pores, no problem—except, wait, is that still a person?

If you’re feeling bad about that tiny blemish you get after a long day, just remember: even the stars get airbrushed into oblivion. When did we decide that skin had to resemble plastic wrap to be considered beautiful?

Natalie Portman

Side-by-side photos labeled “before” and “after” of a woman with short curly brown hair, pink lip gloss, and a strapless outfit at an event. The left image shows natural skin with shine and soft lighting, while the right image is retouched with smoother skin, warmer tones, and enhanced eye and lip color.
Image via hollowichigobanki on Deviant Art

Somebody hit the “warm it up and glam it up” button way too hard. Suddenly, her lips are glossier, her skin’s airbrushed, and her eyes are basically soulless now.

Natalie Portman showed up looking like a walking art piece, let’s be real. Soft glow, sweet makeup. But who had the audacity to dial up the saturation like that?

Whoever did the edit definitely got a little carried away with the virtual makeup bag! Natalie’s natural charm was completely washed out.

Jonathan Rhys Meyers

Side-by-side photos of a man with dark hair and blue eyes, wearing a red shirt and resting his arms on a surface. The left image shows natural skin with visible texture and slight under-eye shadows, while the right image features a retouched version with smoother skin, even complexion, and brighter eyes.
Image via u/Coffeelurker on Reddit

Jonathan looks every bit the brooding heartthrob—rugged, raw, and naturally handsome. You can see the faint lines, the real skin texture, and that little bit of tired charm that makes him look like an actual human being.

He’s the kind of guy who’s been through some stuff and still looks like a leading man. Yet, editors said otherwise. They don’t want a man who has been through some tough events.

It’s a prime example of how even men get the unrealistic beauty treatment these days. Heaven forbid Jonathan Rhys Meyers actually look like the smoldering, real man he is!

Justin Bieber

Side-by-side black and white photos of a shirtless man wearing Calvin Klein underwear, showing detailed arm tattoos. The left image depicts a leaner physique with less muscle definition, while the right image is a retouched version with enhanced muscles, broader shoulders, and more defined abs.
Image via Michael Zhang on petapixel.com

This retouched Bieber could sell anything — underwear, cologne, protein powder. Every muscle carved, jawline sharpened, and let’s not even talk about what they did to those abs. Plus, the underwear.

In reality, Bieber’s original photo showed a slimmer, leaner figure — no less confident, but more human. Even Bieber addressed the chatter, telling Seventeen: “I’m not perfect. I’m comfortable in my own skin.”

Bieber owned the campaign. Calvin Klein called him “a modern icon with an edge”. He was the “perfect fit” for the brand’s edgy image.

George Clooney

Side-by-side images labeled "ANTES" and "DEPOIS" showing a man in a suit with neatly styled gray hair, standing outdoors. The left image displays natural skin with visible lines and texture, while the right image shows a retouched version with smoother skin and enhanced evenness in complexion.
Image via joshbenson.com

Someone thought, “What if Clooney… but make him a wax sculpture?” The dude was already winning at life, but nooo, the airbrush couldn’t resist. Editors’ fingers were itching.

Now his skin’s so smooth, it’s probably slip-proof. Is this the George who smirks at press junkets or his long-lost twin from a hyper-realistic video game?

We want the silver fox we all know and love. It’s not like George needed the digital fountain of youth, right? Batman could charm a rock, with or without Photoshop.

Leighton Meester

Side-by-side images of a woman wearing a strapless white dress, holding a black clutch, and standing in front of a Piaget backdrop. The left image shows a natural look with soft makeup and visible skin texture, while the right image displays a retouched version with bronzed skin, enhanced eye makeup, and a smoother complexion.
Image via Tati Taylor and Tetiana Kostylieva on fixthephoto.com

Oh look, it’s Leighton Meester at her effortlessly stunning best on the left—glowing skin, fresh-faced beauty, and that natural elegance that screams “I woke up like this (but with a killer stylist).”

Apparently, Leighton’s natural beauty just wasn’t “enough” for the digital retouchers. Suddenly, her makeup looks like it was applied by a team of angels. Smoky eyes. Chiseled cheekbones.

See that tan? That probably didn’t exist at the event, but everything is possible with Photoshop. Isn’t it? Even though the original Leighton had us hooked without it.

Kim Kardashian

Side-by-side images of a woman wearing a black bodysuit with a deep neckline, sheer sleeves, and a large statement necklace. The left image shows a natural pose with visible skin texture and curves, while the right image presents a digitally retouched version with a smaller waist, smoother skin, and enhanced lighting.
Image via Emily Cariaga on slrlounge.com

Kim’s natural curves are already the ideal that many people are chasing. Yet even she gets pushed through the Photoshop machine, as if reality isn’t quite good enough.

Here comes the retoucher, and poof—her waist shrinks like magic, hips are boosted, thighs are slimmed, and her skin turns into the smoothest surface known to mankind.

What chance do the rest of us mere mortals have? She’s the queen of curves—the icon who made hourglass figures a pop culture obsession. And yet, even she gets Photoshopped into this unattainable level of “ideal.”

Britney Spears

Side-by-side images of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a pink and white striped sleeveless top, with one hand near her chest. The left image shows a natural look with visible skin texture and shine, while the right image is a Marie Claire magazine cover featuring a retouched version with smoother skin and enhanced hair volume.
Image via Colleen Finney on Medium

Striped top, tousled hair, and that trademark stare that says, “Y’all better behave.” Britney gave us a real “I’ve had a day, but I’m still iconic” energy.

They ironed out every bit of texture, as if the goal was to achieve a Barbie-core finish. The original Britney looks like she could grab a coffee and tell a wild story. And she’s a human. Take note of that. Not a poster in a department store window.

Let a woman keep her facial lines. She’s not a wax figure who’s never seen a pore. Marie Claire, take some notes. Tell your Photoshop intern they don’t get bonus points for every blur.

Share.

Leave A Reply